From: | John McKown <john(dot)archie(dot)mckown(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: A motion |
Date: | 2016-01-25 19:16:56 |
Message-ID: | CAAJSdji+YsC23f4TUSe4YP0FmxdyejBy_qVHo1QYYYoNh05i7Q@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 1:08 PM, Melvin Davidson <melvin6925(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
> Although it has been previously disregarded, I would like to second the
> motion that all further discussion regarding the CoC go to it's own list.
>
> Consider this.
> 1. The Coc will eventually apply to ALL PostgreSQL mail lists.
> 2. There will be a need to have additions and revisions to the Coc.
> 3. As this list is for General (and mostly technical discussions) further
> discussions/emails concerning the CoC only distracts from the purpose of
> this email list.
>
>
Complete agreement. I've kept my hands silent through force of will. Those
who are interested can create a CoC to their heart's content. I will abide
by it or not as I decide. But I try to be acceptably pleasant in all
discussions, even when I disagree with someone.
This thread has been a completely useless; requiring extreme use of my
delete key.
--
Werner Heisenberg is driving down the autobahn. A police officer pulls
him over. The officer says, "Excuse me, sir, do you know how fast you
were going?"
"No," replies Dr. Heisenberg, "but I know where I am."
Computer Science is the only discipline in which we view adding a new wing
to a building as being maintenance -- Jim Horning
Schrodinger's backup: The condition of any backup is unknown until a
restore is attempted.
He's about as useful as a wax frying pan.
Maranatha! <><
John McKown
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | John R Pierce | 2016-01-25 19:32:44 | Re: CoC [Final v2] |
Previous Message | Melvin Davidson | 2016-01-25 19:08:57 | Re: A motion |