| From: | John McKown <john(dot)archie(dot)mckown(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Populating array of composite datatype |
| Date: | 2013-08-07 17:58:07 |
| Message-ID: | CAAJSdjhMbs_Xfwi3-S3mF3gVXGLw8m=DXfVoxHAgNutACm4X+g@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Just wanted to put a short thank you note in here. I've been using
PostgreSQL for a while, but only using basic SQL. The information in this
thread pointed me to the information that I needed to read about to solve a
problem which has been tormenting me, off and on, for a couple of months. I
just couldn't solve the problem with ANSI standard SQL. But finally did
with an array of my own composite data type. This allowed me to _easily_
find and report on some things which should have been identically defined
on multiple systems, but were not.
--
As of next week, passwords will be entered in Morse code.
Maranatha! <><
John McKown
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2013-08-07 18:22:20 | Re: PostrgreSQL Commercial restrictions? |
| Previous Message | Steve Atkins | 2013-08-07 16:04:16 | Re: PostrgreSQL Commercial restrictions? |