From: | Zheng Li <zhengli10(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, li jie <ggysxcq(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, "houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Japin Li <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com>, rajesh singarapu <rajesh(dot)rs0541(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Support logical replication of DDLs |
Date: | 2023-01-19 17:54:38 |
Message-ID: | CAAD30UJ9cF+xURQH7UQkYK5Xsz5Ryap6gSo6a4T9amkEn_jSiw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 2:05 AM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 8:39 AM Zheng Li <zhengli10(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 6:27 AM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, Jan 7, 2023 at 8:58 PM Zheng Li <zhengli10(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > > >
> >
> > Foreign Tables can also be considered replicated with DDL replication because we
> > don't even need to replicate the data as it resides on the external
> > server. Users
> > need to configure the external server to allow connection from the
> > subscriber for
> > foreign tables to work on the subscriber.
> >
>
> So, this would mean that we expect the subscriber will also have the
> same foreign server as the publisher because we will replicate the
> entire connection/user information of the foreign server for the
> publisher.
Yes, CREATE/ALTER SERVER commands are also supported by the current
DDL replication patch.
>But what about data inserted by the publisher on the
> foreign server?
I thought the data inserted to a foreign table will always be stored
on the foreign server unless I'm mistaken?
> > > We should also think
> > > about initial sync for all those objects as well.
> >
> > Agree, we're starting an investigation on initial sync. But I think
> > initial sync depends on
> > DDL replication to work reliably, not the other way around. DDL replication can
> > work on its own without the initial sync of schema, users just need to
> > setup the initial
> > schema just like they would today.
> >
>
> The difference is that today users need to take care of all schema
> setup on both and follow changes in the same on the publisher. But
> with DDL replication, there has to be a point prior to which both the
> nodes have the same setup. For that, before setting up DDL
> replication, users need to ensure that both nodes have the same
> schema, and then during setup, the user doesn't perform any DDL on the
> publisher.
The users can perform DDL during the setup if they do the following:
1. Create a logical replication slot to capture changes on the publisher
2. Do a backup for the publisher
3. Restore the backup as the subscriber
4. Advance the logical slot to the last valid LSN of the restore
5. Create pub/sub and use the above logical slot.
Regards,
Zane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Adrian Klaver | 2023-01-19 22:41:22 | Documentation discrepancy UNIQUE NULLS NOT DISTINCT |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2023-01-19 17:29:53 | Re: minor bug |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2023-01-19 17:55:43 | Re: Add LZ4 compression in pg_dump |
Previous Message | Nathan Bossart | 2023-01-19 17:54:21 | Re: almost-super-user problems that we haven't fixed yet |