From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN fast default |
Date: | 2018-03-29 01:27:55 |
Message-ID: | CAA8=A78DCyYoSZb_jkaDzxNr6LYJuReAz=ubQMEOo6C=rQfv_Q@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 10:19 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>> On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 5:30 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
>>> + /*
>>> + * Missing value for added columns. This is a one element array which lets
>>> + * us store a value of the attribute type here.
>>> + */
>>> + anyarray attmissingval BKI_DEFAULT(_null_);
>>> #endif
>>> } FormData_pg_attribute;
>>>
>>> Still think this is a bad location, and it'll reduce cache hit ratio for
>>> catalog lookups.
>
>> As I think I mentioned before, this was discussed previously and as I
>> understood it this was the consensus location for it.
>
> I don't have a problem with putting that in pg_attribute (and I certainly
> agree with not putting it in pg_attrdef). But "anyarray" seems like a
> damn strange, and bulky, choice. Why not just make it a bytea holding the
> bits for the value, nothing more?
>
That's what we started with and Andres suggested we change it. One
virtue of the array is that is displays nicely when examining
pg_attribute. But changing it back would be easy enough.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Craig Ringer | 2018-03-29 01:29:59 | Re: Small proposal to improve out-of-memory messages |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2018-03-29 01:07:08 | Small proposal to improve out-of-memory messages |