Re: Why can't I select un-grouped columns when grouping by a (non-primary) unique key?

From: Geoff Montee <geoff(dot)montee(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alberto Cabello Sánchez <alberto(at)unex(dot)es>
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Why can't I select un-grouped columns when grouping by a (non-primary) unique key?
Date: 2014-09-24 17:46:48
Message-ID: CAA7biFMG79PnC6HzDnuChtC56fgaXfLKP8wgsJC_amqn8G1QYQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 1:37 PM, Alberto Cabello Sánchez <alberto(at)unex(dot)es>
wrote:
>
> On Wed, 24 Sep 2014 09:04:21 -0700
> Daniel Lenski <dlenski(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > If I include the primary key of a table in my GROUP BY clause, PG 9.3
> > allows me to refer to other columns of that table without explicit
GROUP BY:
> >
> > Why doesn't the same thing work with a non-NULL unique constraint?
>
> At first sight, primary key means no grouping at all, as there are no
> duplicated A.primary_key values:
>
> SELECT A.document
> FROM A
> GROUP BY A.primary_key
>
> is the same as
>
> SELECT A.document
> FROM A

I believe this blog post contains better examples of the feature he's
referring to:

http://www.depesz.com/2010/08/08/waiting-for-9-1-recognize-functional-dependency-on-primary-keys/

For example:

SELECT
p.id,
p.firstname,
p.lastname,
count(*)
FROM
people p
JOIN visits v on p.id = v.person_id
GROUP BY p.id;

Geoff

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Steve Dodd 2014-09-24 17:52:17 Transaction completion timing
Previous Message Alberto Cabello Sánchez 2014-09-24 17:37:10 Re: Why can't I select un-grouped columns when grouping by a (non-primary) unique key?