| From: | Geoff Montee <geoff(dot)montee(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Filip Rembiałkowski <filip(dot)rembialkowski(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PG-General Mailing List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: SQL Server access from PostgreSQL |
| Date: | 2015-05-18 16:23:32 |
| Message-ID: | CAA7biFMBozZvtTUiPJgFNAwd2J+dN2ftRMMwHMWe3e+ohoanUQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hi Filip,
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 7:52 AM, Filip Rembiałkowski
<filip(dot)rembialkowski(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I will be happy to hear your opinion which one is better - odbc_fdw or tds_fdw?
>
> In terms of performance / stability / convenience.
>
> (Pg on OpenSuse, MS SQL on Win2008 )
>
> Thanks!
>
I'm the developer of tds_fdw. I originally developed tds_fdw because I
wasn't able to get odbc_fdw working with FreeTDS. If you try out
odbc_fdw, hopefully you'll have better luck than I did!
If you decide to try out tds_fdw and you have any problems or run into
any bugs, feel free to ask for help on the GitHub page:
https://github.com/GeoffMontee/tds_fdw
Good luck!
Thanks,
Geoff
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Filip Rembiałkowski | 2015-05-18 17:28:26 | Re: SQL Server access from PostgreSQL |
| Previous Message | François Battail | 2015-05-18 15:37:50 | Re: Optimizing a read-only database |