| From: | Sami Imseih <samimseih(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Benoit Lobréau <benoit(dot)lobreau(at)dalibo(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>, Alena Rybakina <a(dot)rybakina(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Imseih (AWS), Sami" <simseih(at)amazon(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Andrey M(dot) Borodin" <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru> |
| Subject: | Re: Logging parallel worker draught |
| Date: | 2024-12-30 15:06:01 |
| Message-ID: | CAA5RZ0veKyd0FRxuueWqtzU8bvpXx3OXCVZeWpSHL8LJb2DXKw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I missed one more point earlier.
I don't think "failure" is a good name for the setting as it's
a bit too harsh. What we really have is a "shortage" of
workers.
Instead of
+ {"failure", LOG_PARALLEL_WORKERS_FAILURE, false},
what about?
{"shortage", LOG_PARALLEL_WORKERS_SHORTAGE, false},
Regards,
Sami
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Sabino Mullane | 2024-12-30 15:48:13 | Re: psql: Option to use expanded mode for various meta-commands |
| Previous Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2024-12-30 13:37:18 | Re: Row pattern recognition |