| From: | Sami Imseih <samimseih(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ilia Evdokimov <ilya(dot)evdokimov(at)tantorlabs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Andrey M(dot) Borodin" <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Alena Rybakina <a(dot)rybakina(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Sample rate added to pg_stat_statements |
| Date: | 2025-01-15 17:16:01 |
| Message-ID: | CAA5RZ0vCLbYfCuECC-wdsyG4VK=UD8wsqtw3xKK1_jZPFqUrYw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Probably, but first I suggest benchmarking with sampling applied to all queries. If the results are good, we can later filter certain queries based on different characteristics.
Absolutely. The benchmark numbers to justify this feature are
the next step. Thanks for your work on this!
Regards,
Sami
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2025-01-15 17:19:03 | Re: Make pg_stat_io view count IOs as bytes instead of blocks |
| Previous Message | Sami Imseih | 2025-01-15 17:09:00 | Re: POC: track vacuum/analyze cumulative time per relation |