| From: | Sami Imseih <samimseih(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: n_ins_since_vacuum stats for aborted transactions |
| Date: | 2025-04-18 19:41:21 |
| Message-ID: | CAA5RZ0v1V8OzsW+WfQP70gYeV1UT4wbtaUQLZegNPA3riH_rzA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> I can see it being confusing. What about this wording to make it more
> clear when the field is
> updated?
here are both of the changes in v4.
--
Sami Imseih
Amazon Web Services (AWS)
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v4-0001-Clarify-when-aborted-rows-are-tracked-for-tuple-r.patch | application/octet-stream | 2.5 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2025-04-18 19:45:58 | Re: disabled SSL log_like tests |
| Previous Message | Sami Imseih | 2025-04-18 19:05:04 | Re: n_ins_since_vacuum stats for aborted transactions |