Re: n_ins_since_vacuum stats for aborted transactions

From: Sami Imseih <samimseih(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: n_ins_since_vacuum stats for aborted transactions
Date: 2025-04-11 00:38:05
Message-ID: CAA5RZ0uLBzQs=feu=QzwthLg9wL_6hKJtr=7c0TuCegiVJT41g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On Fri, 11 Apr 2025 at 02:01, Sami Imseih <samimseih(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > I created an entry for the July CF
> > https://commitfest.postgresql.org/patch/5691/
> >
> > ... and I realized I forgot to include David's code comment patch yesterday,
> > Reattaching both patches.
>
> I've pushed the code comment patch.
>
> For the docs patch, the fact you're having to name specific fields in
> the note at the bottom makes me think the details should be added to
> the row for the field in question instead.

Here is how per line will look like. Either way is fine with me.
with v2, I also did add the clarification in the pg_stat_database.tup_inserted|
updated|deleted fields as well.

--
Sami Imseih
Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Attachment Content-Type Size
v2-0001-Clarify-when-aborted-rows-are-tracked-in-pg_stat_.patch application/octet-stream 3.4 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2025-04-11 00:50:43 Re: Streaming relation data out of order
Previous Message Jacob Champion 2025-04-11 00:12:46 Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER