From: | Sami Imseih <samimseih(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Maiquel Grassi <grassi(at)hotmail(dot)com(dot)br>, Hunaid Sohail <hunaidpgml(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jim Jones <jim(dot)jones(at)uni-muenster(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Imseih (AWS), Sami" <simseih(at)amazon(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Pavel Luzanov <p(dot)luzanov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Erik Wienhold <ewie(at)ewie(dot)name> |
Subject: | Re: Psql meta-command conninfo+ |
Date: | 2025-01-09 20:45:55 |
Message-ID: | CAA5RZ0uF6yhEM=r5yz_5bHRssHxnQkfe38=+MrwTP+of1bV+YA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> I dislike totally discarding the category information we have available to us. How about making a long output with just three columns in non-expanded mode. Setting, Value, Category ?
We can probably make due without a category as
the name of the setting is informative enough, right?
If we go with the 3 column format, then we will just
have a bunch of repeated values for Category, which
looks cluttered, IMO.
Regards,
Sami
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Sami Imseih | 2025-01-09 20:50:18 | Re: Psql meta-command conninfo+ |
Previous Message | Melanie Plageman | 2025-01-09 20:42:54 | Re: Adjusting hash join memory limit to handle batch explosion |