From: | Sami Imseih <samimseih(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Conflicting updates of command progress |
Date: | 2025-04-14 17:13:00 |
Message-ID: | CAA5RZ0s_Hta6PWDwY9Lf-c+14F+C13BK2ax=B6R7bmDNhN6xdQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> While working on [1] I realized that some field of pg_stat_progress_cluste has
> weird value.
Is there a repro that you can share that shows the weird values? It sounds like
the repro is on top of [1]. Is that right?
> AFAICS the current design does not consider that one progress-reporting
> command can be called by another one.
pgstat_progress_start_command should only be called once by the entry
point for the
command. In theory, we could end up in a situation where start_command
is called multiple times during the same top-level command;
> Not sure what the correct fix is. We can
> either ignore update requests from the "nested" commands, or display the
There is a pattern where we do
```
if (progress)
pgstat_progress_update_param
```
cluster_rel can pass down a flag to index_build or others that update progress
to not report progress. Therefore, only the top level command is
updating progress.
what do you think?
[1] https://commitfest.postgresql.org/patch/5117/
--
Sami Imseih
Amazon Web Services (AWS)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2025-04-14 17:13:30 | Re: not null constraints, again |
Previous Message | Wolfgang Walther | 2025-04-14 17:09:55 | Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER |