should num_custom_plans be reset after plan invalidation?

From: Sami Imseih <samimseih(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: should num_custom_plans be reset after plan invalidation?
Date: 2025-03-05 14:27:35
Message-ID: CAA5RZ0sYt1GFwMC2ysKxPFfErOj6w8UXbpo=mkx-waCsd8P5hg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

While examining plan caches, I noticed that when a generic plan is invalidated,
the next execution of the prepared statement still results in a
generic plan. This
is of course with the default plan_cache_mode.

This behavior might go unnoticed since plan cache invalidations are
relatively uncommon,
but I’m unsure if this is the intended design. The existing decision
to switch to
a generic plan—based on the cost average of the first five custom
plans—may no longer
be optimal after a relation is modified (e.g., when a new index is added).
Given this, resetting num_custom_plans to 0 after a plan cache invalidation
might be a better approach.

I've attached an example for reference. The fix seems straightforward,
but since generic
plans may already not handle skewed data optimally, I want to see if others have
thoughts on this being something to fix.

--
Sami Imseih
Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Attachment Content-Type Size
cache_invalidation.txt text/plain 7.2 KB

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2025-03-05 14:33:35 Announcing Release 19.1 of the PostgreSQL Buildfarm client
Previous Message Daniel Verite 2025-03-05 14:25:12 Re: Add Pipelining support in psql