From: | Fabrice Chapuis <fabrice636861(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tang, Haiying/唐 海英 <tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
Cc: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Logical replication timeout problem |
Date: | 2021-10-08 07:33:40 |
Message-ID: | CAA5-nLAVrBZtZ_o-tzbyizFOP3d9mAiG3XUOskShDW01ewfMgw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Thanks Tang for your script.
Our debugging environment will be ready soon. I will test your script and
we will try to reproduce the problem by integrating the patch provided by
Amit. As soon as I have results I will let you know.
Regards
Fabrice
On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 3:15 AM Tang, Haiying/唐 海英 <tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
wrote:
> On Friday, September 24, 2021 12:04 AM, Fabrice Chapuis <
> fabrice636861(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> >
>
> > Thanks for your patch, we are going to set up a lab in order to debug
> the function.
>
>
>
> Hi
>
>
>
> I tried to reproduce this timeout problem on version10.18 but failed.
>
> In my trial, I inserted large amounts of data at publisher, which took
> more than 1 minute to replicate.
>
> And with the patch provided by Amit, I saw that the frequency of invoking
>
> WalSndKeepaliveIfNecessary function is raised after I inserted data.
>
>
>
> The test script is attached. Maybe you can try it on your machine and
> check if this problem could happen.
>
> If I miss something in the script, please let me know.
>
> Of course, it will be better if you can provide your script to reproduce
> the problem.
>
>
>
> Regards
>
> Tang
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bharath Rupireddy | 2021-10-08 07:38:57 | Re: Improve the HINT message of the ALTER command for postgres_fdw |
Previous Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2021-10-08 07:28:04 | Re: More business with $Test::Builder::Level in the TAP tests |