Re: doc: improve the restriction description of using indexes on REPLICA IDENTITY FULL table.

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: doc: improve the restriction description of using indexes on REPLICA IDENTITY FULL table.
Date: 2023-07-18 09:34:35
Message-ID: CAA4eK1Ly=s0YvAVv_dkTNz7DU8MXxwLd5YBs3rVDTTNpehJ8Rg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 12:10 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> BTW, IsIndexOnlyExpression() is not necessary but the current code
> still works fine. So do we need to backpatch it to PG16? I'm thinking
> we can apply it to only HEAD.
>

Either way is fine but I think if we backpatch it then the code
remains consistent and the backpatching would be easier.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Gustafsson 2023-07-18 09:40:31 Re: Increase limit on max length of the password( pg versions < 14)
Previous Message mahendrakar s 2023-07-18 09:30:25 Increase limit on max length of the password( pg versions < 14)