From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: POC: Cleaning up orphaned files using undo logs |
Date: | 2021-09-19 05:14:46 |
Message-ID: | CAA4eK1LwYLrkjgbX-K9dz3vHGjeB4HUsAYK8ATWWe20CBEXrVA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 9:50 PM Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 10:51:42AM +0200, Antonin Houska wrote:
>
> * What happened with the idea of abandoning discard worker for the sake
> of simplicity? From what I see limiting everything to foreground undo
> could reduce the core of the patch series to the first four patches
> (forgetting about test and docs, but I guess it would be enough at
> least for the design review), which is already less overwhelming.
>
I think the discard worker would be required even if we decide to
apply all the undo in the foreground. We need to forget/remove the
undo of committed transactions as well which we can't remove
immediately after the commit.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | A Z | 2021-09-19 05:42:32 | Improved PostgreSQL Mathematics Support. |
Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2021-09-19 04:25:20 | Re: Logical replication timeout problem |