Re: Parallel Seq Scan

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Parallel Seq Scan
Date: 2015-10-16 13:57:20
Message-ID: CAA4eK1LtGnXhfAfRUJZHZMhaESHSrmDsouhi2ptVAG6aG=+R+w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 5:31 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 7:42 AM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
> > I think due to above changes it will report sync location on each page
> > scan, don't we want to report it once at end of scan?
>
> I think reporting for each page is correct. Isn't that what the
> non-parallel case does?
>

Yes, sorry I got confused.

With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2015-10-16 14:02:50 Re: Error creating gin index on jsonb columns
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2015-10-16 13:56:28 Re: pam auth - add rhost item