From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Wei Wang (Fujitsu)" <wangw(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Runqi Tian <runqidev(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, li jie <ggysxcq(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Japin Li <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com>, rajesh singarapu <rajesh(dot)rs0541(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Zheng Li <zhengli10(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Support logical replication of DDLs |
Date: | 2023-04-26 05:56:01 |
Message-ID: | CAA4eK1LqGiqi-HEbo=Pw1CLT7UyyZkP-_WRDarVSiHZ_ASTfaw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 10:01 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 12:58 PM Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)
> <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > Aport from above comments, I splitted the code related to verbose
> > mode to a separate patch. And here is the new version patch set.
> >
>
> As for DDL replication, we create event triggers to write deparsed DDL
> commands to WAL when creating a publication with the ddl option. The
> event triggers are recreated/dropped at ALTER/DROP PUBLICATION. I'm
> concerned it's possible that DDLs executed while such a publication
> not existing are not replicated. For example, imagine the following
> steps,
>
> 1. CREATE PUBLICATION test_pub ... WITH (ddl = 'table);
> 2. CREATE SUBSCRIPTION test_sub ... PUBLICATION test_pub;
> 3. ALTER SUBSCRIPTION test_sub DISABLE;
> 4. DROP PUBLICATION test_pub;
> 5. CREATE PUBLICATION test_pub ... WITH (ddl = 'table);
> 6. ALTER SUBSCRIPTION test_sub ENABLE;
>
> DDLs executed between 4 and 5 won't be replicated.
>
But we won't even send any DMLs between 4 and 5. In fact, WALSender
will give an error for those DMLs that publication doesn't exist as it
uses a historic snapshot. So, why do we expect DDLs between Drop and
Create of publication should be replicated?
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2023-04-26 06:31:13 | Re: Support logical replication of DDLs |
Previous Message | Matthias Apitz | 2023-04-26 05:32:58 | Re: DBD::Pg (version 3.16.3) returns EMPTY char columns as 'undef' |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2023-04-26 06:31:13 | Re: Support logical replication of DDLs |
Previous Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2023-04-26 04:31:17 | Re: Support logical replication of DDLs |