From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | "houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Column Filtering in Logical Replication |
Date: | 2022-03-14 09:53:44 |
Message-ID: | CAA4eK1LpU7EVmnNKMRERbvOyY9m9L4T-974G+Orgv8FiAViqww@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 2:37 AM Tomas Vondra
<tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On 3/12/22 05:30, Amit Kapila wrote:
> >> ...
> >
> > Okay, please find attached. I have done basic testing of this, if we
> > agree with this approach then this will require some more testing.
> >
>
> Thanks, the proposed changes seem like a clear improvement, so I've
> added them, with some minor tweaks (mostly to comments).
>
One minor point: Did you intentionally remove
list_free(rel_publications) before resetting the list from the second
patch? The memory for rel_publications is allocated in
TopTransactionContext, so a large transaction touching many relations
will only free this at end of the transaction which may not be a big
deal as we don't do this every time. We free this list a few lines
down in successful case so this appears slightly odd to me but I am
fine if you think it doesn't matter.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Yugo NAGATA | 2022-03-14 10:12:17 | Re: Implementing Incremental View Maintenance |
Previous Message | shiy.fnst@fujitsu.com | 2022-03-14 09:50:41 | RE: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side |