Re: Deadlock between logrep apply worker and tablesync worker

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
Cc: vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Deadlock between logrep apply worker and tablesync worker
Date: 2023-02-03 04:46:44
Message-ID: CAA4eK1LnjpG_o3J+hmwbHusNY0vKsNn_3F5rmCVuZAu2j+J+wQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Feb 2, 2023 at 4:51 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Thanks for the tests. I also see a reduction in test time variability
> with Vignesh's patch. I think we can release the locks in case the
> origin is concurrently dropped as in the attached patch. I am planning
> to commit this patch tomorrow unless there are more comments or
> objections.
>

Pushed.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2023-02-03 05:20:56 Re: Time delayed LR (WAS Re: logical replication restrictions)
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2023-02-03 04:43:54 Re: Logical replication timeout problem