Re: Slow catchup of 2PC (twophase) transactions on replica in LR

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Vitaly Davydov <v(dot)davydov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Slow catchup of 2PC (twophase) transactions on replica in LR
Date: 2024-07-30 10:58:17
Message-ID: CAA4eK1LnTBBrk1OH20y=0aJSOiE+ziDiLFsqD2yUYOW5FubScA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 4:02 PM vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 25 Jul 2024 at 08:39, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 9:13 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > >
> > > Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > > > I merged these changes, made a few other cosmetic changes, and pushed the patch.
> > >
> > > There is a CF entry pointing at this thread [1]. Should it be closed?
> > >
> >
> > Yes, closed now. Thanks for the reminder.
>
> I noticed one random test failure in my environment with 021_twophase test.
> [10:37:01.131](0.053s) ok 24 - should be no prepared transactions on subscriber
> error running SQL: 'psql:<stdin>:2: ERROR: cannot alter two_phase
> when logical replication worker is still running
> HINT: Try again after some time.'
>
> We can reproduce the issue by adding a delay at apply_worker_exit like
> in the attached Reproduce_random_021_twophase_test_failure.patch
> patch.
>
> This is happening because the check here is wrong:
> +$node_subscriber->poll_query_until('postgres',
> + "SELECT count(*) = 0 FROM pg_stat_activity WHERE backend_type =
> 'logical replication worker'"
>
> Here "logical replication worker" should be "logical replication apply worker".
>
> Attached patch has the changes for the same.
>

LGTM.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2024-07-30 11:08:36 Re: Remove last traces of HPPA support
Previous Message Etsuro Fujita 2024-07-30 10:39:27 Comment in portal.h