From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jan Wieck <jan(at)wi3ck(dot)info>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Nisha Moond <nisha(dot)moond412(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Conflict Detection and Resolution |
Date: | 2024-06-06 10:13:33 |
Message-ID: | CAA4eK1LnAJO99mH8oR3RwZ+3=mCDAJfDx33TVPUJ7GYGOTR3Fg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jun 5, 2024 at 7:29 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 9:37 AM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > Can you share the use case of "earliest_timestamp_wins" resolution
> > method? It seems after the initial update on the local node, it will
> > never allow remote update to succeed which sounds a bit odd. Jan has
> > shared this and similar concerns about this resolution method, so I
> > have added him to the email as well.
> >
> I can not think of a use case exactly in this context but it's very
> common to have such a use case while designing a distributed
> application with multiple clients. For example, when we are doing git
> push concurrently from multiple clients it is expected that the
> earliest commit wins.
>
Okay, I think it mostly boils down to something like what Shveta
mentioned where Inserts for a primary key can use
"earliest_timestamp_wins" resolution method [1]. So, it seems useful
to support this method as well.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ashutosh Bapat | 2024-06-06 10:13:53 | Re: Logical Replication of sequences |
Previous Message | Alexander Lakhin | 2024-06-06 10:00:00 | Assert in heapgettup_pagemode() fails due to underlying buffer change |