| From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
| Subject: | Re: Displaying and dumping of table access methods |
| Date: | 2019-01-10 03:58:07 |
| Message-ID: | CAA4eK1LjZnHCD3Z5ej1-ex5NRrhSGNwLSnCioNk-F7yjmN+eag@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 10:53 PM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 2019-01-09 18:26:16 +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 11:04 PM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> > +1.
> >
> > > Don't like it
> > > too much, but it seems better than the alternative. I wonder if we want
> > > one for multiple regression related issues, or whether one specifically
> > > about table AMs is more appropriate. I lean towards the latter.
> > >
> >
> > I didn't understand what is the earlier part "I wonder if we want one
> > for multiple regression related issues". What do you mean by multiple
> > regression related issues?
>
> One flag that covers all things that make psql output less useful for
> regression test output, or one flag that just controls the table access
> method display.
>
+1 for the later (one flag that just controls the table access method
display) as that looks clean.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Donald Dong | 2019-01-10 04:57:59 | Re: Unified logging system for command-line programs |
| Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2019-01-10 03:50:37 | Re: WIP: Avoid creation of the free space map for small tables |