From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Added missing copy related data structures to typedefs.list |
Date: | 2020-12-30 13:42:26 |
Message-ID: | CAA4eK1Lg9xzrYofaTA9uMFbonyU3Co5Asttm8ER7NSjeHvzumg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Dec 26, 2020 at 9:16 PM vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 4:28 AM Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 01:56:50PM +0530, vignesh C wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Added missing copy related data structures to typedefs.list, these
> > > data structures were added while copy files were split during the
> > > recent commit. I found this while running pgindent for parallel copy
> > > patches.
> > > The Attached patch has the changes for the same.
> > > Thoughts?
> >
> > Uh, we usually only update the typedefs file before we run pgindent on
> > the master branch.
> >
>
> Ok, Thanks for the clarification. I was not sure as in few of the
> enhancements it was included as part of the patches.
>
Yeah, I do that while committing patches that require changes in
typedefs. It is not a norm and I am not sure how much value it adds to
do it separately for the missing ones unless you are making changes in
the same file they are used and you are facing unrelated diffs due to
those missing ones.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dmitry Dolgov | 2020-12-30 13:45:12 | Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Generic type subscripting |
Previous Message | Luc Vlaming | 2020-12-30 13:23:38 | Re: Lazy JIT IR code generation to increase JIT speed with partitions |