From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation |
Date: | 2024-03-26 10:21:02 |
Message-ID: | CAA4eK1LfU+xhXK6R-MMJhRRXijcZHfMRd5Ty420c18NdM8Xrmw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 3:12 PM Bertrand Drouvot
<bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 02:27:17PM +0530, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
> > Please use the v22 patch set.
>
> Thanks!
>
> 1 ===
>
> +reset_synced_slots_info(void)
>
> I'm not sure "reset" is the right word, what about slot_sync_shutdown_update()?
>
*shutdown_update() sounds generic. How about
update_synced_slots_inactive_time()? I think it is a bit longer but
conveys the meaning.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ajin Cherian | 2024-03-26 10:22:25 | Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation |
Previous Message | Bertrand Drouvot | 2024-03-26 10:20:50 | Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation |