From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | sajeevsahadev(at)gmail(dot)com, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: BUG #14254: The postgres service goes down while working with the application |
Date: | 2016-07-18 02:16:44 |
Message-ID: | CAA4eK1LfK-zuCTz9Y6hqW2W9HqXaGH51Sv_++QirG1bV9L+USQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 3:22 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 5:48 PM, <sajeevsahadev(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Bug reference: 14254
>> Logged by: sajeev sahadevan
>> Email address: sajeevsahadev(at)gmail(dot)com
>> PostgreSQL version: 9.6beta1
>> Operating system: Windows 8
>>
>> Description:
>> 2016-07-17 12:33:10 GST LOG: worker process: parallel worker for PID 8088
>> (PID 5588) was terminated by exception 0xC0000005
>> 2016-07-17 12:33:10 GST HINT: See C include file "ntstatus.h" for a
>> description of the hexadecimal value.
>
> Hard to say what's going bad here without more details like the query
> involved, but that's a problem with parallel queries, and a new one.
>
I think it is important to check in 9.6beta2 especially because we
have fixed couple of crashes in parallel worker.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2016-07-18 02:40:15 | Re: BUG #14150: Attempted to delete invisible tuple |
Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2016-07-18 02:08:25 | Re: BUG #14150: Attempted to delete invisible tuple |