| From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Li Japin <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Logical Replication - behavior of ALTER PUBLICATION .. DROP TABLE and ALTER SUBSCRIPTION .. REFRESH PUBLICATION |
| Date: | 2021-01-15 03:09:32 |
| Message-ID: | CAA4eK1LfEqUq=VPK3MbKnSZOqVRELLOgc9MC9T7GFDYB0bQMEA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 5:36 PM Li Japin <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Jan 14, 2021, at 1:25 PM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Attaching following two patches:
>
> 0001 - Makes publisher to not publish the changes for the alter
> publication ... dropped tables. Original patch is by japin, I added
> comments, changed the function name and adjusted the code a bit.
>
>
> Do we really need to access PUBLICATIONRELMAP in this patch? What if
> we just set it to false in the else condition of (if (publish &&
> (relkind != RELKIND_PARTITIONED_TABLE || pub->pubviaroot)))
>
>
> Thank for you review. I agree with you, it doesn’t need to access PUBLICATIONRELMAP, since
> We already get the publication oid in GetRelationPublications(relid) [1], which also access
> PUBLICATIONRELMAP. If the current pub->oid does not in pubids, the publish is false, so we
> do not need publish the table.
>
> I have another question, the data->publications is a list, when did it has more then one items?
>
> 0001 - change as you suggest.
>
Can we add a test case for this patch as this seems to be a
reproducible bug? We can add the test in
src/test/subscription/100_bugs.pl unless you find a better place to
add it.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Wang, Shenhao | 2021-01-15 03:29:57 | RE: invalid data in file backup_label problem on windows |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2021-01-15 03:02:56 | Re: Remove PG_SHA*_DIGEST_STRING_LENGTH from sha2.h |