Re: Parallel Seq Scan

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Kouhei Kaigai <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Fabrízio Mello <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Parallel Seq Scan
Date: 2015-03-13 12:17:46
Message-ID: CAA4eK1LcK7a7QMr4u_Khs5oikc36FCsgSrwPH+FR5GknYb6-RA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 10:35 PM, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
> Another problem. I restarted the instance (just in case), and get this
error:
>
> # \df+ *.*
> ERROR: cannot retain locks acquired while in parallel mode
>

This problem occurs because above statement is trying to
execute parallel_unsafe function (obj_description) in parallelmode.
This will be resolved once parallel_seqscan patch is integrated
with access-parallel-safety patch [1].

[1]
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/4/155/

With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Svenne Krap 2015-03-13 12:43:26 Re: WIP Patch for GROUPING SETS phase 1
Previous Message Robert Haas 2015-03-13 11:48:24 Re: Proposal : REINDEX xxx VERBOSE