From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
Cc: | Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Vitaly Davydov <v(dot)davydov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Slow catchup of 2PC (twophase) transactions on replica in LR |
Date: | 2024-07-19 12:44:55 |
Message-ID: | CAA4eK1LbkJXFv7oPCC9TyHOOiuXmokVqGErWtS63XgmWh=9LMA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 5:12 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> I'll continue my review and testing of the patch but I thought of
> sharing what I have done till now.
>
+ /*
+ * Do not allow changing the option if the subscription is enabled. This
+ * is because both failover and two_phase options of the slot on the
+ * publisher cannot be modified if the slot is currently acquired by the
+ * existing walsender.
+ */
+ if (sub->enabled)
+ ereport(ERROR,
+ (errcode(ERRCODE_OBJECT_NOT_IN_PREREQUISITE_STATE),
+ errmsg("cannot set %s for enabled subscription",
+ option)));
As per my understanding, the above comment is not true when we are
changing 'two_phase' option from 'false' to 'true' because in that
case, the existing walsender will only change it. So, ideally, we can
allow toggling two_phase from 'false' to 'true' without the above
restriction.
If this is correct then we don't even need to error for the case
"cannot alter two_phase when logical replication worker is still
running" when 'two_phase' option is changed from 'false' to 'true'.
Now, assuming the above observations are correct, we may still want to
have the same behavior when toggling two_phase option but we can at
least note down that in the comments so that if required the same can
be changed when toggling 'two_phase' option from 'false' to 'true' in
future.
Thoughts?
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2024-07-19 13:03:57 | Re: Add new COPY option REJECT_LIMIT |
Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2024-07-19 12:40:05 | Re: Make COPY format extendable: Extract COPY TO format implementations |