| From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions |
| Date: | 2020-09-15 12:45:46 |
| Message-ID: | CAA4eK1LazUEWeWzU49qBsPYshYj5h2pQP9MEKdGjADF1RTF5xA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 5:27 PM Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 9:40 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Another thing, I noticed is that originally we have subscriber-side
>> support as well, see [1] (see *pgoutput* patch) but later dropped it
>> due to some reasons [2]. I think we should have pgoutput support as
>> well, so see what is required to get that incorporated.
>>
> I have added the rebased patch-set for pgoutput and subscriber side changes as well. This also includes a test case in subscriber.
>
As mentioned in my email there were some reasons due to which the
support has been left for later, have you checked those and if so, can
you please explain how you have addressed those or why they are not
relevant now if that is the case?
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ashutosh Bapat | 2020-09-15 13:24:44 | Re: Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers, take 2 |
| Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2020-09-15 12:42:48 | Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions |