Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions
Date: 2020-07-15 11:23:57
Message-ID: CAA4eK1LZcAACBwrXouogSOOj+EPZWicfCwkLX+bTBWcZtgYuHQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 4:51 PM Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 2:05 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> Please see the
>> latest patch set v33.
>>
>>
>>
>
> I have a minor comment. You've defined a new function ReorderBufferStartStreaming() but the function doesn't actually start streaming but is used to find out if you can start streaming and it returns a boolean. Can't you name it accordingly?
> Probably ReorderBufferCanStartStreaming(). I understand that it internally calls ReorderBufferCanStream() which is similar sounding but I think that should not matter.
>

+1. I am actually editing some of the patches and I have already
named it as you are suggesting.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2020-07-15 11:50:03 Re: SQL/JSON: functions
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2020-07-15 11:22:21 file_fdw vs relative paths