Re: Broken hint bits (freeze)

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Vladimir Borodin <root(at)simply(dot)name>, Dmitriy Sarafannikov <dsarafannikov(at)yandex(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Broken hint bits (freeze)
Date: 2017-06-15 09:30:18
Message-ID: CAA4eK1LZ4_My_1Usus5jKYqJ8sz=02cmFKxHT8160Sph7mKkZA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 8:44 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 07:45:17PM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
>> > Now, it seems we later added a doc section early on that talks about
>> > "Verify standby servers" so I have moved the wal_level section into that
>> > block, which should be safe. There is now no need to start/stop the new
>> > server since pg_upgrade will do that safely already.
>> >
>>
>> ! <para>
>> ! Also, if upgrading standby servers, change <varname>wal_level</>
>> ! to <literal>replica</> in the <filename>postgresql.conf</> file on
>> ! the new cluster.
>>
>> I think it is better to indicate that this is required for the master
>> cluster (probably it is clear for users) /"on the new cluster."/"on
>> the new master cluster.". Do we need something different for v10 where
>> default wal_level is 'replica'
>
> You know, I thought about that and was afraid saying "new master
> cluster" would be confusing because it isn't a master _yet_, but if you
> feel it will help, and I considered it, let's add it. The problem is
> that in the old instructions, at the point we were mentioning this, it
> was the new master, which is why I evaluated removing it in the first
> place. (Yeah, I am amazed I considered all these cases.)
>
> Updated patch attached. Thanks.
>

Looks good to me.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2017-06-15 10:36:43 Re: A bug in mapping attributes in ATExecAttachPartition()
Previous Message Ashutosh Bapat 2017-06-15 09:05:09 Re: A bug in mapping attributes in ATExecAttachPartition()