| From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: replication commands and log_statements |
| Date: | 2014-08-12 04:37:34 |
| Message-ID: | CAA4eK1LYn8B7crzt_XXQLK7QM8S0vvaFtfLy-KiDgyFfeq4-ug@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 9:29 AM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 2:34 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
> >
> > If you have a user devoted to it, I suppose that's true. I still
> > think it shouldn't get munged together like that.
>
> Why do we need to treat only replication commands as special ones and
> add new parameter to display them?
One difference is that replication commands are internally generated
commands. Do we anywhere else log such internally generated
commands with log_statement = all?
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2014-08-12 04:58:17 | Re: Removing dependency to wsock32.lib when compiling code on WIndows |
| Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2014-08-12 04:23:35 | Re: postgresql.auto.conf and reload |