From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Cc: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_stat_get_replication_slot and pg_stat_get_subscription_worker incorrectly marked as proretset |
Date: | 2022-03-02 02:12:50 |
Message-ID: | CAA4eK1LLsxOXaPaP52MkQ4fREV=wE9nQrM5C5ZZhZWnhrAQqYg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 8:57 AM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 12:03 PM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 09:52:02AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > > Thanks, so you are okay with me pushing that patch just to HEAD.
> >
> > Yes, I am fine with that. I am wondering about patching the second
> > function though, to avoid any risk of forgetting it, but I am fine to
> > leave that to your judgement.
> >
>
> The corresponding patch with other changes is not very far from being
> ready to commit. So, will do it along with that.
>
This is done as part of commit:
https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=7a85073290856554416353a89799a4c04d09b74b
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kyotaro Horiguchi | 2022-03-02 02:17:04 | Re: Make mesage at end-of-recovery less scary. |
Previous Message | wangw.fnst@fujitsu.com | 2022-03-02 02:06:17 | RE: Logical replication timeout problem |