| From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_upgrade and logical replication |
| Date: | 2024-07-25 03:11:22 |
| Message-ID: | CAA4eK1LLPORhSxLG+N3E5ARufFEOU4SvQBOm0qQ1tOVtH1Qkmg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 10:03 PM Nathan Bossart
<nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 11:32:47AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > LGTM.
>
> Thanks for reviewing. Committed and back-patched to v17.
>
Shall we close the open items? I think even if we want to improve the
slot fetching/creation mechanism, it should be part of PG18.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2024-07-25 03:13:03 | Re: pg_upgrade and logical replication |
| Previous Message | David Rowley | 2024-07-25 03:08:47 | Re: Parent/child context relation in pg_get_backend_memory_contexts() |