| From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Ádám Balogh <adam(dot)balogh(at)ericsson(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Remove a redundant condition check |
| Date: | 2020-06-27 05:22:49 |
| Message-ID: | CAA4eK1LGWcizcDipMqv7yBZ+XN7+SsW5XhDSPT=UJE2bPkMd4w@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 3:32 PM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 02:39:22PM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > It seems we forgot to remove the additional check for switchedTLI
> > while adding a new check. I think we can remove this duplicate check
> > in the HEAD code. I am not sure if it is worth to backpatch such a
> > change.
>
> Yes, there is no point to keep this check so let's clean up this
> code. I also see no need to do a backpatch here, this is purely
> cosmetic.
>
Thanks for the confirmation, pushed!
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2020-06-27 09:07:34 | Re: update substring pattern matching syntax |
| Previous Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2020-06-27 05:14:28 | Re: xid wraparound danger due to INDEX_CLEANUP false |