From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, "tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>, Greg Nancarrow <gregn4422(at)gmail(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Önder Kalacı <onderkalaci(at)gmail(dot)com>, japin <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: row filtering for logical replication |
Date: | 2022-01-20 03:44:22 |
Message-ID: | CAA4eK1LFK-doDKFoa_Ps371n_YUh9D2WJ5K7C1w1O8RyfuSrMw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 7:51 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> 5. DEBUG level 3
>
> I found there are 3 debug logs in this patch and they all have DEBUG3 level.
>
> IMO it is probably OK as-is,
>
+1.
> but just a comparison I noticed that the
> most detailed logging for logical replication worker.c was DEBUG2.
> Perhaps row-filter patch should be using DEBUG2 also?
>
OTOH, the other related files like reorderbuffer.c and snapbuild.c
are using DEBUG3 for the detailed messages. So, I think it is probably
okay to retain logs as is.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Justin Pryzby | 2022-01-20 03:59:14 | Re: pg_upgrade should truncate/remove its logs before running |
Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2022-01-20 03:29:19 | Re: row filtering for logical replication |