| From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, "shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Introduce wait_for_subscription_sync for TAP tests |
| Date: | 2022-08-05 02:57:23 |
| Message-ID: | CAA4eK1LDb0d3Dgk4O_UN2Yn9BfoQY_rH688M4-qVLDs-4wxA3Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Aug 4, 2022 at 7:13 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > Yes. I've attached patches for backbranches.
>
> FWIW, I'd recommend waiting till after next week's wrap before
> pushing these. While I'm definitely in favor of doing this,
> the odds of introducing a bug are nonzero, so right before a
> release deadline doesn't seem like a good time.
>
Agreed. I was planning to do it only after next week's wrap. Thanks
for your suggestion.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2022-08-05 03:55:33 | Re: BTMaxItemSize seems to be subtly incorrect |
| Previous Message | Kyotaro Horiguchi | 2022-08-05 02:49:16 | Re: An attempt to avoid locally-committed-but-not-replicated-to-standby-transactions in synchronous replication |