From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Ali Akbar <the(dot)apaan(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dmitry Vasilyev <d(dot)vasilyev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Postgres service stops when I kill client backend on Windows |
Date: | 2015-10-12 11:16:25 |
Message-ID: | CAA4eK1LBsLgM-9gCUEUWvqU_6B6_HfXuNy1hQ4UTdiDrCQz0ZQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 3:45 PM, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 9:12 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > I could easily reproduce the issue if logging collector is on and even
if
> > we try to increase the loop count or sleep time in
PGSharedMemoryCreate(),
> > it doesn't change the situation as the syslogger has a valid handle to
> > shared memory. One way to fix is to just close the shared memory handle
> > in sys logger as we are not going to need it and attached patch which
does
> > this fixes the issue for me. Another invasive fix in case we want to
> > retain shared memory handle for some purpose (future requirement) could
> > be to send some signal to syslogger in restart path so that it can
release
> > the shared memory handle.
>
> +#ifdef EXEC_BACKEND
> + if (!CloseHandle(UsedShmemSegID))
> + elog(LOG, "could not close handle to shared memory: error
> code %lu", GetLastError());
> +#endif
> I am pretty sure that you would want a WIN32 block here, not
> EXEC_BACKEND as the latter can be used on non-Windows platforms as
> well to emulate Windows behavior.
>
Agreed, I can change the patch to use WIN32, but it seems not all
people want to follow this approach. So lets first try to see what
is the best way to fix.
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2015-10-12 11:45:03 | Re: Parallel Seq Scan |
Previous Message | Emre Hasegeli | 2015-10-12 10:32:59 | Re: point_ops for GiST |