| From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Change the way that LWLocks for extensions are allocated. |
| Date: | 2016-11-08 12:23:42 |
| Message-ID: | CAA4eK1L30MiOSPjuDE8QVY4Nce_NRO6_3_-cFUegzByqoqes2g@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> I had also thought about it while preparing patch, but I couldn't find
>> any clear use case. I think it could be useful during development of
>> a module, but not sure if it is worth to add a target. I think there
>> is no harm in adding such a target, but lets take an opinion from
>> committer or others as well before adding this target. What do you
>> say?
>
> Ok. We can do that.
>
> I have verified the updated v2 patch. The patch looks good to me. I am
> marking it as ready for committer.
Thanks for the review.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2016-11-08 15:53:24 | pgsql: Improve handling of dead tuples in hash indexes. |
| Previous Message | Ashutosh Sharma | 2016-11-08 10:53:06 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Change the way that LWLocks for extensions are allocated. |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Steele | 2016-11-08 12:32:21 | Re: Fix checkpoint skip logic on idle systems by tracking LSN progress |
| Previous Message | Michael Banck | 2016-11-08 12:22:41 | Re: [PATCH] Reload SSL certificates on SIGHUP |