| From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: FailedAssertion at ReorderBufferCheckMemoryLimit() |
| Date: | 2020-06-10 11:18:45 |
| Message-ID: | CAA4eK1L2ZsX3f7hbChqOCJFpz0aO0B3e7vKrcYP=4rrvYhEj6w@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 9:15 AM Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On 2020/06/10 12:00, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 2:28 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 1:56 PM Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>
> >>> I wonder if we may
> >>> need to keep evicting the transactions until we don't exceed
> >>> memory limit.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Yes, that should be the right fix here.
> >>
> >
> > Can you please check whether the attached patch fixes the problem for you?
>
> Thanks for the patch! The patch looks good to me.
>
Thanks, pushed!
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2020-06-10 11:26:32 | Re: Atomic operations within spinlocks |
| Previous Message | Amit Khandekar | 2020-06-10 10:39:58 | Re: Inlining of couple of functions in pl_exec.c improves performance |