Re: 10.1: hash index size exploding on vacuum full analyze

On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 12:27 PM, AP <pgsql(at)inml(dot)weebeastie(dot)net> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 09:08:23AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 8:08 PM, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru> wrote:
>> The estimation depends on the type of columns and stats. I think we
>> need to use schema and stats in the way AP is using to see the effect
>> AP is seeing. I was under impression that AP will help us in
>> verifying the problem as he can reproduce it, but it seems he is busy.
>
> Different fires keep springing up and they are causing delay. This
> is still on my mind and I'll get back to it as soon as I can.
>

Okay. I think Ashutosh has reproduced it with a standalone test, let
us see if that suffice the need. In any case, feel free to verify in
the meantime.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com