Re: Commit fest 2019-09

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Commit fest 2019-09
Date: 2019-10-01 02:33:44
Message-ID: CAA4eK1L=u-idvOKc1GMhZBpE5jfceS+UqLxwTEQed4MTF5zktw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 12:54 AM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> After closing a few patches that have been dead for months, and moving
> the rest to the next commitfest, here's the results:
>
> statusstring │ week1 │ week2 │ week3 │ week4 │ final
> ────────────────────────┼───────┼───────┼───────┼───────┼───────
> Needs review │ 165 │ 138 │ 116 │ 118 │ 0
> Waiting on Author │ 30 │ 44 │ 51 │ 44 │ 0
> Ready for Committer │ 11 │ 5 │ 8 │ 11 │ 0
> Returned with Feedback │ 1 │ 4 │ 5 │ 5 │ 28
> Moved to next CF │ 2 │ 4 │ 4 │ 4 │ 191
> Committed │ 14 │ 23 │ 32 │ 34 │ 42
> Rejected │ 1 │ 1 │ 1 │ 1 │ 1
> Withdrawn │ 4 │ 9 │ 11 │ 11 │ 12
>
> This means we got 28 patches committed during this month ... which is
> a rather concerningly low figure.
>

Yes, I agree that we can improve these numbers. However, like others,
I would also like to thank you for sincere and dedicated efforts in
this CF. It really helps in moving things forward.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2019-10-01 02:39:34 Re: [HACKERS] [WIP] Effective storage of duplicates in B-tree index.
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2019-10-01 02:11:14 Re: Memory Accounting