Re: running logical replication as the subscription owner

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Jelte Fennema <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Subject: Re: running logical replication as the subscription owner
Date: 2023-05-11 11:38:41
Message-ID: CAA4eK1L=qzRHPEn+qeMoKQGFBzqGoLBzt_ov0A89iFFiut+ppA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Apr 4, 2023 at 9:40 PM Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 10:09 PM Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> wrote:
> > I gather we agree on what to do for v16, which is good.
>
> I have committed the patches.
>

Do we want the initial sync to also respect 'run_as_owner' option? I
might be missing something but I don't see anything in the docs about
initial sync interaction with this option. In the commit a2ab9c06ea,
we did the permission checking during the initial sync so I thought we
should do it here as well.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Gustafsson 2023-05-11 12:21:22 Re: createuser --memeber and PG 16
Previous Message Yurii Rashkovskii 2023-05-11 11:24:23 Re: [PATCH] Allow Postgres to pick an unused port to listen