Re: [BUG] FailedAssertion in SnapBuildPurgeOlderTxn

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Maxim Orlov <orlovmg(at)gmail(dot)com>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] FailedAssertion in SnapBuildPurgeOlderTxn
Date: 2022-11-25 06:40:20
Message-ID: CAA4eK1L+isoav3ZZhnp5nqi_3sQyeW3UW3takU0bXavV2cWgNA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 4:43 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 1:48 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 12:00 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > Agreed not to have a test case for this.
> >
> > I've attached an updated patch. I've confirmed this patch works for
> > all supported branches.
> >
>
> I have slightly changed the checks used in the patch, otherwise looks
> good to me. I am planning to push (v11-v15) the attached tomorrow
> unless there are more comments.
>

Pushed.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Anton A. Melnikov 2022-11-25 07:13:29 Re: [PATCH] Add peer authentication TAP test
Previous Message Yugo NAGATA 2022-11-25 06:27:02 Remove a unused argument from qual_is_pushdown_safe