Re: A question about wording in messages

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: A question about wording in messages
Date: 2022-09-16 08:58:34
Message-ID: CAA4eK1KybpOAqjuRc4GTighdAK4Jb1uFPdsW+nk=2eT0uEuLEw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 2:07 PM Kyotaro Horiguchi
<horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> At Fri, 16 Sep 2022 12:29:52 +0530, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote in
> > So, the change related to wal_decode_buffer_size needs to be
> > backpatched to 15 whereas other message changes will be HEAD only, am
> > I correct?
>
> Has 15 closed the entry? IMHO I supposed that all changes are applied
> back(?) to 15.
>

We only want to commit the changes to 15 (a) if those fixes a problem
introduced in 15, or (b) those are for a bug fix. I think the error
message improvements fall into none of those categories, we can map it
to (b) but I feel those are an improvement in the current messages and
don't seem critical to me.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Maxim Orlov 2022-09-16 08:59:20 Re: Add 64-bit XIDs into PostgreSQL 15
Previous Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2022-09-16 08:37:08 Re: A question about wording in messages