| From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Benoit Lobréau <benoit(dot)lobreau(at)dalibo(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Shlok Kyal <shlok(dot)kyal(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nitin Motiani <nitinmotiani(at)google(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: long-standing data loss bug in initial sync of logical replication |
| Date: | 2025-02-25 10:42:10 |
| Message-ID: | CAA4eK1KwE6KXY2p_yw_w91iJZKBFRiCMekm_z6FTw_BMy+b8tA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 3:56 PM Benoit Lobréau
<benoit(dot)lobreau(at)dalibo(dot)com> wrote:
>
> After reading the thread and doing a bit of testing, the problem seems
> significant and is still present. The fact that it's probably not well
> known makes it more concerning, in my opinion. I was wondering what
> could be done to help move this topic forward (given my limited abilities)?
>
You can help with the review/test of the proposed patch. Also, help
with the performance impact of the patch, if possible. Shlok has done
some performance testing of the patch which you can perform
independently and then Sawada-San has asked for more performance tests
in his last email (1) which you can also help with.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ashutosh Bapat | 2025-02-25 11:04:28 | Re: Reducing memory consumed by RestrictInfo list translations in partitionwise join planning |
| Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2025-02-25 10:36:32 | Re: Restrict copying of invalidated replication slots |