On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 3:26 AM Tomas Vondra
<tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>
> so I've been looking at tweaking the code so that the behavior matches
> Alvaro's expectations. It passes check-world but I'm not claiming it's
> nowhere near commitable - the purpose is mostly to give better idea of
> how invasive the change is etc.
>
I was just skimming through the patch and didn't find anything related
to initial sync handling. I feel the behavior should be same for
initial sync and replication.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.