From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Remove incorrect assertion in reorderbuffer.c. |
Date: | 2020-12-04 09:05:03 |
Message-ID: | CAA4eK1KrY=1iMyfy1t4-MZWzf=TY-+fwPM-7JJHT5sZQc41PXw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 11:19 AM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 5:33 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > We start recording changes in ReorderBufferTXN even before we reach
> > SNAPBUILD_CONSISTENT state so that if the commit is encountered after
> > reaching that we should be able to send the changes of the entire
> > transaction. Now, while recording changes if the reorder buffer memory
> > has exceeded logical_decoding_work_mem then we can start streaming if
> > it is allowed and we haven't yet streamed that data. However, we must
> > not allow streaming to start unless the snapshot has reached
> > SNAPBUILD_CONSISTENT state.
> >
> > I have also improved the comments atop ReorderBufferResetTXN to
> > mention the case when we need to continue streaming after getting an
> > error.
> >
> > Attached patch for the above changes.
> >
> > Thoughts?
>
> LGTM.
>
Thanks for the review, Pushed!
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Sergei Kornilov | 2020-12-04 09:06:10 | Re: pg_stat_statements oddity with track = all |
Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2020-12-04 09:02:33 | Re: Single transaction in the tablesync worker? |