From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Nisha Moond <nisha(dot)moond412(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Conflict detection for update_deleted in logical replication |
Date: | 2024-12-09 10:32:19 |
Message-ID: | CAA4eK1Kjj1YfaDFuY5eFm8RkGO=YJ1t193=-39CBqLq76wSFZg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Dec 9, 2024 at 3:20 PM Nisha Moond <nisha(dot)moond412(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Here is a summary of tests targeted to the Publisher node in a
> Publisher-Subscriber setup.
> (All tests done with v14 patch-set)
>
> ----------------------------
> Performance Tests:
> ----------------------------
> Test machine details:
> Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7-4890 v2 @ 2.80GHz CPU(s) :120 - 800GB RAM
>
> Setup:
> - Created two nodes ( 'Pub' and 'Sub'), with logical replication.
> - Configurations for Both Nodes:
>
> shared_buffers = 40GB
> max_worker_processes = 32
> max_parallel_maintenance_workers = 24
> max_parallel_workers = 32
> checkpoint_timeout = 1d
> max_wal_size = 24GB
> min_wal_size = 15GB
> autovacuum = off
>
> - Additional setting on Sub: 'track_commit_timestamp = on' (required
> for the feature).
> - Initial data insertion via 'pgbench' with scale factor 100 on both nodes.
>
> Workload:
> - Ran pgbench with 60 clients for the publisher.
> - The duration was 120s, and the measurement was repeated 10 times.
>
You didn't mention it is READONLY or READWRITE tests but I think it is
later. I feel it is better to run these tests for 15 minutes, repeat
them 3 times, and get the median data for those. Also, try to run it
for lower client counts like 2, 16, 32. Overall, the conclusion may be
same but it will rule out the possibility of any anomaly.
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jakub Wartak | 2024-12-09 10:52:16 | Re: doc: Mention clock synchronization recommendation for hot_standby_feedback |
Previous Message | Jakub Wartak | 2024-12-09 10:27:40 | Re: FileFallocate misbehaving on XFS |